Why is Obama’s F.H.A. helping the rich buy luxury condos?
October 282010
From:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-13/manhattan-luxury-condos-embrace-federal-help-in-game-changer-for-sales.html
<<The Federal Housing Administration agreed in March to insure mortgages for apartments at the 98-unit Gramercy Park development, known as Tempo. That enables buyers to make a down payment of as little as 3.5 percent in a building where apartments range from $820,000 to $3 million.>>
Now, some simple calculus for you, folks. Buying an $820,000 property (that’s the very cheapest of these luxury apartments) at 3.5% one will have to make a $5K payment (mortgage plus condo-fees) every month for 30 years:
http://www.mlcalc.com/#mortgage-820000-3.5-30-4.375-3000-1500-0.52-8-2010-none
Why is the Obama’s Federal Housing Authority — which can not even properly house all the poor eligible for the Section 8 assistance (http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/housing-crisis-reaches-full-589653.html ) — busying itself with and tying their budget on people, who can afford to spend $5K/month on an apartment and are interested in living next to a pet spa?
If the housing market moves down only 3.5%, these new mortgages will be "underwater" — the condo-owners will owe banks more, than the properties are worth. This is when people usually tend to "walk away" from the properties — and is why a normal downpayment is at least 10% (usually — 20%). When people do walk away, the FHA (read, the taxpayers) will be on the hook for the rest of the mortgages… And rich people will not shy from walking away at all (now that we no longer throw dead-beats into jail):
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/07/rich-defaulting-at-highest-rate.html
Is it fair to suspect, this is done to further destroy Capitalism? After the staggering success with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, who were told by the government to relax their rules:
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/30/business/fannie-mae-eases-credit-to-aid-mortgage-lending.html
to allow people buy unaffordable homes resulting in the housing bubble and the subsequent crisis of financial system:
http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2008-10-05-1.html
is the FHA now instructed to do a similar relaxation of rules to give Socialists another argument that "Capitalism does not work"?
Or is it simply a way to reward rich New York donors — both the buyers and the sellers of these luxury condos — for their support of the Democratic Party?
In a properly Free Market Capitalism, people who make a wrong bet — such as choosing to build a luxury building, when the buyers want a normal one — get punished by losing money. In Obama’s CRONY Capitalism, the government helps them out — at the taxpayers’ expense…
Correrafan! If you are referring to Bush’s use of Haliburton, well, that did not start with him (with Clinton rather) nor end with him (Obama keeps awarding the company no-bid contracts).
But I don’t recall anything like this thing on Bush’s watch — there is a completely new ground broken here, I think…
That can’t be true. He’s helping the working class. BAHAHAHAHA!!! It will be interesting to see what his followers think despite your many links.